Care home demand near Battle

5-mile catchment · 63 homes · 1,661 beds · CQC + ONS

The area within 5 miles of Battle carries 47.9 care beds per 100 residents aged 85+, against a national average of 32.5 - oversupplied

47.9
beds per 100 aged 85+ (national 32.5)
1,661
registered beds · 63 homes
3,468
residents aged 85+ in catchment
+64.0%
projected 85+ change to 2043
The Battle catchment looks oversupplied today, but its population aged 85+ is projected to change +64.0% by 2043. Hold today's 1,661 beds and the same stock falls to 29.2 per 100, a shortfall of 188 beds. Today's balance is tomorrow's shortage.
3,468
85+ today
5,688
85+ in 2043

Demand & supply in the Battle catchment

Residents aged 75+ (within 5 miles)11,470
Residents aged 85+3,468
Registered care beds1,661
Beds per 100 aged 85+47.9
Beds at the national rate (32.5/100)1,127
Surplus vs national rate534 beds
Beds in homes registered for nursing727
Beds in homes registered for dementia938

Quality of the nearby stock

Outstanding · 6Good · 1,108Requires improvement · 217Inadequate · 0Not rated · 261

254 beds sit in homes rated Requires improvement or Inadequate, supply that may not endure and therefore latent demand a new scheme can plan around.

Care homes nearest Battle

HomeProviderBedsTypeCQCMiles
Saxonwood
TN33 0EY
Sussex Housing and Care36ResidentialGood0.35
Hazel Lodge Care Home
TN33 0HW
Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited70ResidentialGood0.73
Hazel Lodge Care Home
TN33 0HW
Scarborough Hall Limited70ResidentialNot rated0.73
Parkgate Manor
TN33 9DT
Parkgate Manor40ResidentialRequires improvement1.19
Cedarwood House Care Home
TN33 0TG
Cedarwood House Limited20ResidentialRequires improvement1.31
Edendale Lodge
TN33 9DB
Belmont Healthcare (Edendale) Limited35ResidentialGood2.1
Abbey Lodge
TN33 0SH
Care Matters (S.E.) Limited18ResidentialGood2.13
EVHM LLP - 1 Johnson Close
TN37 7BG
EVHM LLP4ResidentialGood3.31
EVHM LLP - 5 High Beech Close
TN37 7TT
EVHM LLP4ResidentialGood3.32
EVHM LLP - 6 High Beech Close
TN37 7TT
EVHM LLP4ResidentialGood3.32
Heatherdene Nursing Home
TN39 5HL
Zeenat Nanji & Tasneem Osman28NursingGood3.79
Lennox Lodge
TN39 5HL
Mr Guy Haddow30ResidentialGood3.79
Lennox Lodge
TN39 5HL
Lennox Lodge Ltd30ResidentialNot rated3.79
Thornwood Care Limited
TN39 5HZ
Thornwood Care Limited16ResidentialGood3.89
Whitegates Retirement Home
TN35 4SB
Greensleeves Homes Trust24ResidentialGood4.06

Appraising a care site near Battle?

Threshold Care turns this into a site-level appraisal: drop a pin, set the catchment, and see the over-85 demand, every competing home and its CQC rating, the gap, and the maximum land bid, in under 60 seconds.

Start a free trial →

Care near Battle - questions

How many care home beds are near Battle?
Within 5 miles of Battle there are 1,661 registered care home beds across 63 CQC-registered homes, of which 727 are in homes registered for nursing care and 938 for dementia care.
Is Battle short of care home beds?
The 5-mile catchment around Battle has 47.9 beds per 100 residents aged 85+, against a national average of 32.5 - oversupplied. That is around 534 beds above the national rate.
How will care demand near Battle change by 2043?
The population aged 85+ in the Battle catchment is projected to change by +64.0% by 2043 (ONS 2022-based projections). Held at today's beds, that would be 29.2 beds per 100 aged 85+, a shortfall of 188 beds at the national rate.

This catchment sits mainly in East Sussex, where you can see the full local-authority picture.
Nearby towns: St Leonards-on-Sea · Bexhill-on-Sea · Hailsham · Rye · Heathfield · Wadhurst · Cranbrook · Polegate
All towns · By local authority

Method: a 5-mile catchment around Battle. Supply is every CQC-registered care home in reach (beds, nursing and dementia scope, latest rating) from the CQC HSCA Active Locations register; demand is ONS small-area population aged 75+/85+; growth is ONS 2022-based subnational projections for the 85+ band. The national benchmark of 32.5 beds per 100 aged 85+ is computed from the data, not assumed. Estimates for research and site screening, not a commissioned feasibility study. Updated July 2026.